With this change for the better – seemingly, at least and the pre-release hoopla, I had hoped that this most innovative betting system, Betting Supremacy, would likely develop into something significantly superior to the standard dross all of us read about every week. What exactly did I discover? Continue reading to uncover whether or not you could be heading towards becoming a supreme bettor [sorry about the attempted pun], or being supremely shafted...
Betting Supremacy is seemingly priced quite reasonably at £47.00, and contains the – by now common – upsell on the back-end. (Never consider the upsell – the merchandise will be decent or it won’t, and it should not be necessary to invest in another item in the event that it is!)
It can be downloaded immediately from a secure site, and is supplied in PDF file format. Betting Supremacy extends to 22 pages of content, of which the actual system covers three. Why do these people insist on padding these systems out? I personally, would pay twice this amount for a third of the content if it was worth it!
There seem to be 10 rules, the last 3 of which seem to be preposterous and can't be regarded as remotely ’scientific’. They are, without providing too much detail:
- Ignore horses that finished specifically in this position. Just in front or just behind is fine… duh!
- Don’t bet at these three tracks… double duh! (They’re not all-weather, which might have been acceptable. Might…)
- Don’t bet in these two seemingly random race types that have no relation to each other.
So what about the actual primary rules? Basically, the majority of appear to be realistically sensible, which in turn pleasantly surprised me. There will probably be a sweet spot for a period; and it is entirely possible that older horses as well as larger fields influence final results.
BUT… let me reveal the rub.
Most of these modern day internet marketing folks have gotten so ‘advanced’ these days, that, not only do they outsource the design, as well as the sales copy and the video recording (I suspect), but it clearly seems to me personally as though they are now outsourcing the actual system research as well!
Once again, if perhaps they’d engaged an individual who knew anything at all with regards to horse racing in Great Britain that would certainly be okay. However it appears that they haven’t.
Betting Supremacy is without a doubt – I'm 100% certain – researched making use of Adrian Massey’s system generator. All of the rules are specifically back-checkable [is that a word or am i making my own up again] using that facility. Now, I must point out that, I have no qualms with Adrian's tool whatsoever; I am just using it as a reference point.
Consequently it’s easy for me to be able to let you know precisely and specifically whether or not this system made a profit. Answer? Yes. In spite of itself, as well as the ineptitude from the minion who most likely invested several weeks hammering arrays of variables directly into Massey’s machine, the system actually shows an enormous profit since 2008.
BUT, as always… allow me to scratch somewhat deeper…
The following is the entire picture from 2004 to this morning (all of these numbers are to £100 stakes at approximated Betfair odds):
Bets | Wins | Win Strike Rate | Win % Return at Est. Betfair Odds |
16297 | 2238 | 13.70% | 104.20% |
And here is the annual breakdown:
Year | Bets | Wins | Win Strike Rate | Win % Return at Est. Betfair Odds |
2004 | 2169 | 288 | 13.30% | 99.80% |
2005 | 2308 | 287 | 12.40% | 89.50% |
2006 | 2714 | 377 | 13.90% | 104.10% |
2007 | 2685 | 355 | 13.20% | 98.20% |
2008 | 3032 | 442 | 14.60% | 116.00% |
2009 | 3236 | 471 | 14.60% | 112.10% |
2010 | 153 | 18 | 11.80% | 90.80% |
You personally, most certainly, would have experienced some sort of nervous breakdown in a few of those years!
And this is what this all meant in economic terms (from the end May 04 to present):
31-May-04 | -3266 | 31-Jan-05 | -6215 | 30-Jan-06 | -21640 | ||
| 30-Jun-04 | -889 | 28-Feb-05 | -6521 | 28-Feb-06 | -23814 | ||
| 31-Jul-04 | -4267 | 31-Mar-05 | -7447 | 31-Mar-06 | -25153 | ||
| 31-Aug-04 | 4063 | 31-May-05 | -11672 | 31-May-06 | -24643 | ||
| 30-Sep-04 | 3035 | 30-Jun-05 | -18579 | 30-Jun-06 | -28449 | ||
| 31-Oct-04 | 4585 | 31-Jul-05 | -22106 | 31-Jul-06 | -27002 | ||
| 30-Nov-04 | 1319 | 31-Aug-05 | -18250 | 31-Aug-06 | -23023 | ||
| 31-Dec-04 | -497 | 30-Sep-05 | -22220 | 30-Sep-06 | -23270 | ||
| 31-Oct-05 | -21638 | 31-Oct-06 | -19305 | ||||
| 30-Nov-05 | -24576 | 30-Nov-06 | -20168 | ||||
| 31-Dec-05 | -24684 | 31-Dec-06 | -13683 |
| 31-Jan-07 | -11150 | 31-Jan-08 | -13635 | 31-Jan-09 | 28120 | ||
| 28-Feb-07 | -8798 | 29-Feb-08 | -14916 | 28-Feb-09 | 36789 | ||
| 31-Mar-07 | -12446 | 31-Mar-08 | -15132 | 31-Mar-09 | 44866 | ||
| 31-May-07 | -22461 | 31-May-08 | -5245 | 31-May-09 | 58123 | ||
| 30-Jun-07 | -24695 | 30-Jun-08 | 1107 | 30-Jun-09 | 60427 | ||
| 31-Jul-07 | -21137 | 31-Jul-08 | 6632 | 31-Jul-09 | 64461 | ||
| 31-Aug-07 | -20854 | 31-Aug-08 | 14399 | 31-Aug-09 | 58429 | ||
| 30-Sep-07 | -14720 | 30-Sep-08 | 18873 | 30-Sep-09 | 65501 | ||
| 31-Oct-07 | -20084 | 31-Oct-08 | 23676 | 31-Oct-09 | 66273 | ||
| 30-Nov-07 | -21961 | 30-Nov-08 | 25688 | 30-Nov-09 | 69680 | ||
| 31-Dec-07 | -18604 | 31-Dec-08 | 30053 | 31-Dec-09 | 69135 |
| 30-Jan-10 | 66189 | ||||||
| 08-Feb-10 | 67722 |
In the event that you go ahead and take the perspective that something’s changed since 2006, which can be material to the final results (and I simply cannot see precisely what myself), then you definitely could possibly fight a solid case for the results subsequently, which indicate a profit of nearly 800 points. Sharp Exhale!
But in my honest opinion - that’s one pretty big ‘IF’.
Allow me to put it another way. How’s the punting self-discipline these days? Would you honestly follow Betting Supremacy through a run of 20, or maybe more, consecutive losers, and proceed to shovel on the £100 (or whatever your unit) stakes faithfully, losing race after losing race?
Betting Supremacy had – count all of them – ONE HUNDRED AND ONE such losing runs, including 24 where there were 30 or more losers in a row!
You will need some sort of titanium betting bank, some rather large brass items and an iron constitution in order to stomach that.
Betting Supremacy - Final Review Summary
What appeared at first glance encouraging enough became completely unstuck any time additional scrutiny was placed on it.
Betting Supremacy is blatantly back-fitted and, although a few of the rules possess value, the amateurish dynamics associated with the actual research shines through as brightly as the midnight sun in the sleepy Icelandic man’s house with no curtains (arguably not my best analogy ever…)
As is usually the truth (I think) with these types of systems, a potentially golden concept is quickly turned to lead – in some form of unusual reverse alchemy – through the ineptitude of the production line team without having actual betting / system research experience.
You may actually even have a bit of fun with this system, albeit to very small stakes. But, as a serious investment tool and the end of your financial worries please, look elsewhere…
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment